The Cheka-OGPU's telegram channel stated that while traveling to different countries Anatoly Chubais Anatoly Chubais has decided to end his journey and chose to live in England. He has already selected a place to stay, which is one of the most expensive and prestigious private villages of St. George’s Hill in Surrey, where there is a huge mansion. Boris MintsThis mansion actually holds and protects the Chubais family office and assets for huge amounts. Mintz bought a neighboring mansion and carried out expensive renovations, claiming it was for his son.
However, it has now been revealed that Mintz's neighbor will be Anatoly Chubais instead of a relative, and he is the one designated for the mansion in St. George’s Hill.
As VChK-OGPU reported, Chubais initially planned to settle in Italy, where someone else had previously bought a mansion for him. Oleg Kiselev (also known as Gedaliah Waxer). But after the poisoning incident in Italy, Chubais decided that it would be safer in England.
Over the past 2 years, there have been reports in Russian media about various financial 'scams' related to or involving Anatoly Chubais.
When evaluating Anatoly Chubais's activities more closely, it's important to note that he continues to remain in the shadows in the majority of financial 'scams.'
Chubais and MintsMost of his deputies, friends, and acquaintances are the 'planting material,' not Chubais himself.
Continuing the publications on the website rucriminal.info dated August 07, 2022 'It is much tastier than paying a million' and dated August 29, 2022 'We are poor people, don't give us all the profit,' another audio recording was obtained, revealing the source of the declared profitability and financing of Anatoly Chubais's life in Russia.
The participants of this meeting, already known from previous publications, include:
1. Ilya Gulin – financial director of Mintsev companies;
2. Sergey Krychenko – Founder and General Director of Anatoly Chubais's Russian Family Office;
3. Olga Butkova – financial director of Anatoly Chubais's Russian Family Office;
During this meeting, the participants discussed and resolved the following issues:
– systematically providing Anatoly Chubais with cash and non-cash funds through documents signed as part of 'sham transactions' and ensuring annual declared profitability;
– determining the very low cost of the 'purchase' by Anatoly Chubais of the Peredelki Residential Complex in the area 8,000,000 USD or 520 000 000 rubles.
It's worth noting that the estimated cost of the 'Alterations' Residential Complex was around 47,000,000 US dollars, and the market value, according to three independent assessments, including a judicial one, was: 34,000,000 before 36,500,000 US dollars.
One should assume that in 2019, Anatoly Chubais purchased the Peredelki Residential Complex property from Boris Mints's Cypriot company for the aforementioned amount, which was determined by the Chubais team in the annual budget.
Rosreestr does not provide any information on this matter.
– Given the shared interest between associate and business partner Boris Mints and Anatoly Chubais, it should be assumed that Anatoly Chubais is likely providing constant, direct financing from his own funds through Boris Mints' offshore structures, possibly obtained illegally and undeclared.
According to reports in the media from 2018 to 2022, it appears that Boris Mints is directly involved in the fraud of Otkritie FC bank and the misappropriation of pension funds from Russian citizens through offshore companies affiliated with the financial corporation O1 Group owned by Boris Mints.
Some of the mentioned companies were also creditors of Anatoly Chubais at the same time.
Therefore, it is likely that Anatoly Chubais used his share in the Mintsy as borrowed money acquired through illegal means.
Under these circumstances, the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow's position on the criminal case No. 123632 (which is still under consideration by Judge Filchenko M.C.) seems unreasonable.
Firstly: The criminal case was inappropriately sent to the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow, which is not within its jurisdiction.
Secondly: The case has been continuously postponed for almost a year without being considered on its merits for various reasons.
Thirdly: There is abundant evidence in the case materials of case No. 123632 indicating gross violations of the law, including substitution, forgery, and falsification of the case materials to falsely accuse Ilya Suchkov of serious crimes he did not commit.
The court fails to address the need to investigate, among other things, the origin of the so-called borrowed money, the legitimacy of loan agreements possibly directed by Anatoly Chubais, the evaluation and bidding of 'ZhK Alterations,' and the amount and reasons for Anatoly Chubais' purchase of ZhK Peredelki and subsequent property sales to third parties.
During the consideration of case No. 01-0104/2022, it became evident that the judge presiding over the case has a strong interest in its outcome, evidenced by the blatant violations of Russian legislation, such as refusing to provide the defendants and their lawyers with case materials for almost a year.
The court is also continuing to consider criminal case No. 01-0104/2022 without including part of the case materials mentioned in the indictment, and it disregards and superficially considers the defendants' petitions.
Additionally, the court refuses to issue refusals to challenge a judge and minutes of court sessions, as well as call defense witnesses.
The judge's behavior reflects a serious violation of the defendants' rights and procedural norms, which raises concerns about the fairness of the proceedings.
The court is not paying attention to the fact that there is no decision in the case file recognizing Mosin D. as the representative of the victim, the Cypriot company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED).
The court is allowing improper representatives of the injured Cyprus company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) – beneficiary Boris Mints) – Mosina D.V. and lawyer Goryaynov I.Yu. to participate in court sessions unlawfully.
The court is illegally continuing to consider criminal case No. 01-0104/2022 without the amount of alleged damage caused to the Cypriot company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) being established by the investigation.
The court is continuing to unlawfully consider criminal case No. 01-0104 / 2022 in the absence of the beneficiaries of the Cypriot company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) Mr. Mintsev, despite significant discrepancies in their testimony and the materials of the case.
The court is unlawfully considering criminal case No. 01-0104/2022 in the absence of the victim Chubais A.B., despite significant discrepancies in the amount allegedly inflicted on Chubais by A.B. on the circumstances underlying the indictment.
The judge Filchenko M.C. allowed numerous violations of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in the consideration of criminal case No. 01-0104 / 2022, due to the absence of any response from the Judicial Collegium for Criminal Cases of the Moscow City Court to numerous complaints.
The Judicial Board has completely withdrawn itself in terms of judicial control over the court of first instance, as it becomes obvious.
Unfortunately, as expected, the story of Mintsev and Anatoly Chubais ends more than successfully for them.
After all the “heavy hardships,” Anatoly Chubais finally found his haven in London, thanks to a friend.
Ilya Gulina (financial director of Mintsev) with Sergey Krychenko (Adjutant Anatoly Chubais) and Olga Butkova (financial director of the Russian family office of Anatoly Chubais headed by Sergey Krychenko).
Sergei Krychenko said they were ready to fulfill 12 million rubles, and at the last meeting, they mentioned they can even meet 10 million rubles without having received a final verdict from Anatoly Chubais.
Olga Butkova mentioned that something might be added unexpectedly.
Sergey Krychenko said it's possible that there will be changes in the first half of the year, but in which direction is uncertain. He also talked about structuring their property correctly.
Ilya Gulin: yes
Sergey Krychenko: and all this should be followed by some financial transactions, there is a connection here, so we want to establish this connection and understand how much we need at what point.
Olga Butkova: now I start. Before we talked, the cost of these Alterations (LCD Alterations) was estimated at around 8,000,000 US dollars, now it's different, I considered the budget to be 520,000,000 rubles, so we have non-cash money until it's gone. It's supposed that this will be non-cash money that you will return as part of the loan and then the same money will be returned somehow in cash, I don't understand how. Dmitry Mints will receive 520 million rubles under the contract for the sale of ZhK Peredelki concluded between him and Anatoly Chubais.
Ilya Gulin: what do I assume by default. The amount of money is returned to the non-cash account (by Anatoly Chubais) for the loan, of this money the part that you evaluate (assuming the assessment of ZhK Peredelok) goes to Dmitry Mints, at this moment we default to that this money is credited to a certain virtual account of the boss (Anatoly Chubais), that is, they return to him in a non-cash form.
Olga Butkova: but in non-cash, not in cash? This is important.
Ilya Gulin: we believe that a certain account with the main (Anatoly Chubais) with us (Mintsev) has increased by this amount, then from where the money is debited every time you need something. Then look, for example, you say we need to get this money, in fact, the money that originally belonged to him, his white money, ok, then we confirm this there and give it away in some range, because in any case, the equipment there will need to be discussed.
Olga Butkova: why am I asking this question, because when we discussed it with him (Anatoly Chubais), he says I don't care about this topic because this is a technical amount (it means an amount of 520,000,000 rubles). I explain to him (Anatoly Chubais) that this technical amount should go from your personal account and, accordingly, this amount will be less on a non-cash account
Ilya Gulin: Yes, this is true, and we need to agree on what to do with this as a reserve for personal future plans. This is the subject of some discussion. This is his part of the white money transformed into income.
Sergey Krychenko: fix the question for tomorrow, what to do with these grandmothers (it means with 520,000,000 rubles).
Olga Butkova: I have another question about non-cash money.
Sergey Krychenko: on loan repayment?
Olga Butkova: yes. I don't even have as much to repay the loan to Boris Iosifovich (Mints) as to repay the loan to Ruben Karlenovich (Vardanyan), the balance remained there.
Sergey Krychenko: well, let's go through these loans now.
Ilya Gulin: what is the rest?
Olga Butkova: well, you gave us 210 million rubles at the end of the year (assuming 2015), and we took 480 million rubles.
Ilya Gulin: oh, I don't know about that.
Olga Butkova: how do you not know? You know very well that we paid for the PAI (referring to the PAI of the Closed-End Mutual Fund “Perspective Companies”), but we borrowed money.
Ilya Gulin: I gave the money back to him (meaning Ruben Vardanyan).
Olga Butkova: You give them yes, but we do that? You then returned the money to them, of course, unequivocally.
Ilya Gulin: so, you don't actually owe them, you only owe them according to the documents.
Olga Butkova: according to the documents, all the same, this money should be taken from a non-cash account, here.
Sergey Krychenko: should I ask Ruben (Vardanyan) about the request of the client (Anatoly Chubais)?
Olga Butkova: why am I using “non-cash” money, because the term for repaying the loan to him (Ruben Vardanyan) is July (it means 2016).
Sergey Krychenko: when we resolved the issue of repaying the loan that we gave to Boris Iosifovich (Mints).
Ilya Gulin: when all this was happening, the most important ones told me that they agreed, Mints agreed with AB (Anatoly Borisovich Chubais) that it would be 3-4 months, I tell you directly verbatim. I now live in this logic.
Olga Butkova: well, yes, we did the loan agreement until October 01 (it means 2016).
Sergey Krychenko: You said 3-4 months is excellent, you don’t have any technical failures or indications, do we live by the same logic?
Ilya Gulin: So far I have not had any other information at all.
Sergey Krychenko: wonderful, for three, four months we report January, February, March, well, the end of April, the beginning of May.
Ilya Gulin: Well, apparently, yes.
Sergey Krychenko: that means the end of April, the beginning of May, the forecast, while we think so. Now they are there “boss” (Anatoly Chubais) will think.
Ilya Gulin: for me, too, so that you understand, this will be a certain point of departure on which I do not influence in any way, as soon as it happens, so that not only I have a headache on this topic. I’m just going to provide further equipment here, who, as it looms on the horizon.
Sergey Krychenko: Dima (Dmitry Mints) correctly heard that the figure we mentioned was 12-10 (meaning million rubles), how we fit because of the exchange rate, this is just our figure, this is not his (Anatoly Chubais) figure, but he (Dmitry Mints ) jumped right at me.
Ilya Gulin: Dima (Dmitry Mints) attacked me in the same way, I told him that it was you who originally voiced it. Sergei (Sergey Krychenko) made his own calculations and said that so far, according to their calculations, this is so much, but with a reservation for a possible change in the amount. This is exactly what I said.
Sergey Krychenko: I didn’t insure my “liver” with this very reservation, but it actually was because when we last discussed the budget for the year, drew approximately the expenses that await us, then he (Anatoly Chubais) already there I sketched a correction of such not weak ones from where we got it and appeared in February at 356 (thousands of US dollars are meant). Yes?
Olga Butkova: this is not February, this is April.
Sergey Krychenko: 356.
Olga Butkova: what 356?
Sergey Krychenko: Dollars, thousand.
Olga Butkova: What are you talking about now?
Sergey Krychenko: about February “cash”.
Olga Butkova: What are you talking about now?
Sergey Krychenko: about cash.
Olga Butkova: “cash” is generally for us February of these 30 and March 60 (thousands of US dollars are implied). We do not have such amounts in crazy dollars.
Sergey Krychenko: we don’t have such a huge amount in February, do we?
Olga Butkova: No, we don’t have a huge amount. Why do you think so?
Ilya Gulin: the task is to understand the budget and comment on what we can in this regard. The number has two parts. I’m just summarizing. The first part, you and I there, plus, minus “shot down” found an understanding, sort of like your vision with our capabilities, sort of. There is a second part that we do not know, respectively, as soon as it is clear, we will think of something about it. Therefore, as of today, we have a consensus.
Olga Butkova: and, accordingly, there is a “non-cash” part that we also understand, that while we are in this …, and also that we do not understand.
Ilya Gulin: in continuation of the dialogue on numbers, please, in the near future, it’s not clear today, formulate a request for February so that I also release the “cache”.
Olga Butkova: I have formulated it, I can just tell you the amount for today.
Ilya Gulin: come on.
Olga Butkova: I have 26 million.
Ilya Gulin: rubles?
Olga Butkova: yes
Ilya Gulin: is it somehow split up within a month?
Sergey Krychenko: whatever is more convenient for you.
Olga Butkova: whatever is more convenient for you, we will adjust. We will distribute when we receive.
Ilya Gulin: if you do not have a binding, I will think about it.
Sergey Krychenko: we try so that all our expenses, namely ours that we plan, “suck”, think over, vary in the range between the 25th and 30th of each month. There is a force majeure, an SMS message with an order to give tomorrow
Ilya Gulin: force majeure is understandable. Another clarifying question, since we are currently interacting with you only on this part, here is the conditional budget that we previously had, the amounts that we are now talking about, they are part of this budget.
Sergey Krychenko: Yes, of course. We’re only talking about “natal” and that’s it.
Ilya Gulin: and this is it. This is conditionally speaking the February need.
Sergey Krychenko: yes
Olga Butkova: yes. The whole common part and this is the budget, and I share it non-cash / cash.
Sergey Krychenko: it means that now, in order to simply understand the logic in which we live, we minimize those expenses (non-cash expenses are implied), so the load on the “cash” part has increased greatly and significantly, very much in order to save money … This is the logic is simple.
Ilya Gulin: this is understandable.
The source of the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU said that moving around the countries Anatoly Chubais decided on the end point of his journey – he decided to settle in England. A place to stay has already been chosen. This is one of the most expensive and prestigious private villages of St. George’s Hill […]
Ilya Gulin: this is understandable.
