Law enforcement officers are investigating the former head of Rosnano Anatoly Chubais and his associates for corruptionreports TASS.
“Various divisions of Russian law enforcement agencies, as part of the verification of information received about the commission of corruption by the former head of Rosnano, Chubais and his entourage, are interrogating potential witnesses and examining the documentation received before checking for signs of a crime,” the agency’s source said.
Anatoly Chubais in CyprusAt the same time, law enforcement agencies are checking information about the accounts of the former head of Rosnano Anatoly Chubaishidden in European banks.
Rucriminal.info has repeatedly discussed illicit activities involving Anatoly Chubais. We continue our investigation.
Remember, Anatoly Chubais established the Swiss Company SFO Concept AG JSC in 2010, where he was the sole ultimate beneficiary, and subsequently its sole shareholder until May 2013, as well as SFO CONCEPT CONSULTING LLC, which was set up in 2012 by the same Anatoly Chubais, but only within Russia as his Russian Family Office.
As we mentioned before, Anatoly Chubais chose Sergey Krychenko for the position of the head of the Russian Family Office for specific reasons.
Exactly Sergey Krychenko was a personal “adjutant” for Anatoly Chubais, handling all his personal matters, including planning personal trips and organizing events, and also representing Anatoly Chubais to partners, business associates, acquaintances, relatives, etc.
Sergey Krychenko was responsible for opening/closing bank accounts, issuing bank cards for Anatoly Chubais within Russia, managing transactions, and overseeing construction as a Trustee under an agreement signed in January 2013 by the Manager of the Swiss company SFO Concept AG JSC Andre Odermatt, on behalf of Anatoly Chubais for the construction of residential complex “Peredelki”.
Furthermore, as we mentioned earlier, Sergey Krychenko was closely associated with the sons and employees of the office, including Boris MintsDmitry Mintse and others. It was Sergey Krychenko who handled all their current matters for the benefit of his superior m, Ilya Gulin Anatoly Chubais including financial ones.It is evident that all the financial schemes directly overseen by Sergey Krychenko were carried out solely in the interests of
Anatoly Chubais and his family. By nature, all these schemes were highly questionable in terms of compliance with current legislation. In December 2012, a non-purpose loan agreement was made between the owned
Anatoly Chubais Swiss company SFO Concept AG JSC and the Russian Family Office Anatoly Chubais – SFO CONCEPT CONSULTING LLC. Anatoly Chubais lent money to himself in US dollars with a repayment deadline by the end of December 2014. 530 000 The repayment of this so-called loan was done in an interesting way, as per Chubaisovsky, by increasing the quarterly payment from the Swiss Company JSC “SFO Concept AG”, which was owned by
Anatoly Chubais as a Trustee, family office, or Anatoly Chubais within Russia – SFO CONCEPT CONSULTING LLC, based on the Trust Management Agreement dated January 2013. It seems likely that this loan was mainly for the formal legal justification by Anatoly Chubais, with the help of Sergey Krychenko, of another financial scheme to move funds through his Companies in order to increase their declared profitability and the profitability of their Moscow family office.
Anatoly Chubais) as an individual, a sales contract was also concluded between Anatoly Chubais and his Russian family office LLC “SFO CONCEPT CONSULTING”, where he formally sold, only on paper, to his Russian family office owned by him (
Anatoly Chubais), movable property: an armored car Mercedes-Benz G class, a snowmobile, and more.The whole financial scheme was, in our opinion, devised by Anatoly Chubais, with Sergey Krychenko's involvement, solely to create the missing, imaginary declared profitability by Anatoly Chubais as an individual.
Following the exposure of the above “muddy scheme, Anatoly Chubais we are reminded of the article “Chubais’s giant“ egg-pod” was found” dated April 25, 2022, which details a potential “raider takeover” at the negligible cost of the Peredelki Residential Complex after Ilya Suchkov refused to take part in an illegal scheme in 2016..
Anatoly Chubais Boris and Dmitry Mintsev were involved in the illegal handling of funds through the Swiss Company JSC “SFO Concept AG” and subsequently causing its intentional bankruptcy. Remember that in 2016, the Cypriot company KRIZNA HOLDINGS LTD terminated the contract for the assignment of rights of claim with the also-affiliated company “DENIAN LTD” (British Virgin Islands), and initiated the process of collecting a loan from the Swiss company JSC “SFO Concept AG” in the Bryansk Region Arbitration Court, possibly due to complicity.The change of jurisdiction was possible due to the fact that the Russian Family Office was made the second defendant in violation of the law, without the knowledge of the debtor – the Swiss company.
Anatoly Chubais Boris Mints – SFO CONCEPT CONSULTING LLC, with an authorized capital of Boris Mints Because of this guarantee agreement signed with the Russian Family Office
Anatoly Chubais under which the mentioned Russian Family Office acted as a guarantor, for the connected The Cypriot company KRIZNA HOLDINGS LTD enabled the resolution of a civil dispute between two foreign companies in the Arbitration Court of the Bryansk Region. It should be noted that the Russian Family Office 100,000 rubles.
Anatoly Chubais until the time the case was accepted for production by the Arbitration Court of the Bryansk Region, he did not engage in any activity in the Bryansk Region. This court, as it should be assumed, was chosen by Anatoly Chubais for a different reason, understandable to all.In this connection, several questions arise, including, which we hope will be answered: Boris Mints 1. Why, in our opinion, the Arbitration Court of the Bryansk Region issued an illegal decision to recover from the debtor and his so-called guarantor the amount of debt in the sum of US dollars, according to unverified data? 2. Why was it not confirmed and established at the court session what the guarantor possessed – the family office
Anatoly Chubais
assets, with an authorized capital of 7 929 375 rubles, he could answer jointly and severally, on an equal footing with the debtor of the Swiss Company JSC “SFO Concept AG” to the creditor of the Cypriot company KRIZNA HOLDINGS LTD on an artificially created debt of almost
In our opinion, the only correct answer suggests itself, which is that since we are talking about another artificially created scheme, very dubious from a legal point of view, by none other than Anatoly Chubais, then asking such questions to the “celestial being himself” Anatoly Chubais neither the law enforcement agencies, nor even the Arbitration Court of the Bryansk Region could. 100,000 Since, as we believe, the law of the Russian Federation on 8,000,000 US dollars?
Anatoly Chubais and does not apply to his proxies. Obviously, Anatoly Borisovich Chubais and his proxies are “more equal” than all other citizens of the Russian Federation before the law. As we have already written repeatedly, in our opinion, it is precisely for the above reason that, as part of the illegal criminal prosecution of entrepreneur Ilya Suchkov, after the return of the criminal case by the Odintsovo City Court of the Moscow Region to the prosecutor in 2020 for additional
investigation On December 09, 2020, solely at the initiative of the senior investigator of the Investigative Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Odintsovo urban district – Egorova Zh.A., in order to justify her illegal actions, it is worth assuming that not without mercenary motives, without a statement from the victim, liquidated in November 2018, The Cypriot company KRIZNA HOLDINGS LTD initiated another criminal case against Ilya Suchkov, on the fact of alleged fraud on an especially large scale. To her Egorova Zh.A. as previously stated obviously on request
Anatoly Chubais transmitted through Sergey Krychenko, through another “muddy scheme” material evidence was sold – the Residential Complex “Alteration” to the same .
Anatoly Chubais
The interests of the person considered the victim in the illegal criminal case No. 120011460225000182, which was closed in November 2018 involving the Cypriot company KRIZNA HOLDINGS LTD, were represented by another trustee, Mosin Dmitry Valerievich, this time. Anatoly Chubais – Mosin Dmitry Valerievich. It's important to note that when Dmitry Mosin made a false statement against Ilya Suchkov in October 2020, he knew for sure that the damage to the Cyprus company KRIZNA HOLDINGS LTD by the Swiss Company SFO Concept AG JSC on December 24, 2018 had been fully repaid. At that time, he did not have the authority, based on the power of attorney he had, to make such a statement and submit it regarding the procedural succession of power of attorney from the company 01 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) in relation to the liquidated Cypriot company KRIZNA HOLDINGS LTD to law enforcement agencies on the illegally initiated criminal case No. 120011460225000182..
Regardless, Dmitry Mosin, as mentioned earlier, is another confidant of Anatoly Chubaisbut also Boris Mintz who, despite knowing that his statement is false, requests in his 2020 statement to consider the issue of alleged damage caused by Ilya Suchkov to the Cyprus company KRIZNA HOLDINGS LTD, which was liquidated in November 2018. Considering these circumstances, law enforcement agencies should have at least viewed Dmitry Mosin's statement regarding Ilya Suchkov as a false accusation. However, the senior investigator Yegorova Zh.A. viewed it differently and took the decision to unlawfully initiate a criminal case against Ilya Suchkov in 2020.
Anatoly Chubais
Once again, it is important to note that in the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow, Judge Filchenko M.S., due to a sense of complete impunity, continues to commit serious violations of the defendants' rights. This time, it is manifested in: – substituting and distorting the concepts indicated by the judge in the minutes of the court session dated March 28, 2022, with the circumstances actually stated by the accused and their defense lawyers in the court session; and Boris Mintz – not allowing the defendants and their defense lawyers to review the judicial materials of criminal case No. 01-0104/2022 available at the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow; – failing to provide the accused and their defenders with material evidence available in the case file; – summoning to the court session, in the absence, according to the materials of the case, he has powers since February 2021, the so-called representative of the victim Dmitry Mosin.
– According to numerous media reports about questionable schemes, including the legalization and provision of the missing annual declared part of the profitability by
Anatoly Chubais
Sergei Krychenko, the “raider seizure” of the Peredelki Residential Complex, the legalization of Anatoly Chubais doubtfully received from his associate.
– failure to provide the accused and their defenders with material evidence available in the case file;
– summoning to the court session, in the absence, according to the materials of the case, he has powers since February 2021, the so-called representative of the victim Dmitry Mosin.
According to numerous publications in the media regarding “muddy schemes”, including legalization and provision of the missing annual declared part of the profitability Anatoly Chubais Sergei Krychenko, the “raider seizure” of the Peredelki Residential Complex, the legalization of Anatoly Chubais doubtfully received from his associate Boris Mintz more 20,000,000 US dollars, as well as other facts exhibited in publications, we hope that, as part of the verification conducted by law enforcement agencies in relation to Anatoly Chubais and his “accomplices”, the “muddy schemes” indicated in the media publications will not be ignored.
