Petition Mikhail Glushchenko, a former deputy known as Misha Khokhol and a former gangster who was on parole, was rejected by the court yesterday. The defense failed to persuade the court that the criminal could benefit society. Revision Kompromat GroupUnderstood why St. Petersburg does not need the old criminal authority.
Strength and Justice
The defense attached positive traits to the case file, attempting to convince the court that the elderly bandit “took the path of correction.” According to the defense, the court should show not punitive power, but the power of justice.
The prosecutor’s office relied on the seriousness of the crime as the basis for refusal.
Almost everyone has reason to believe that once free, Misha Khokhol does not want to peacefully retire and spend old age gardening in the countryside. The man who brought the city on the Neva the loud and sad glory of the criminal capital would hardly retire immediately, barely experiencing freedom. Additionally, the business style of the 90s has long been a thing of the past. The ability to organize gangs of killers is no longer required by anyone.
In reality, the ex-deputy is a major concern for the modern world. crimeHe certainly has authority. But what should the 2021 drug dealers do with it?
Talking about the prospects for communication between Misha Khokhol and the current associates outside the city, informed individuals note that the first thing Glushchenko did was to seek support from the leader of the Tambov group, the esteemed “Spaniard” – Gennady Petrov. Not only for reasons of respect, but also for money and their assets. He demands a share of the previously invested. And as sources indicate Kompromat GroupThere were quite a few, and the share in those enterprises that are now under the control of Tambov residents has grown significantly. As they say, interest has accrued over decades.
Mad share
Certainly, an authoritative inmate has not been abandoned in prison all these years. Support from the outside and a share of the common fund has been at the disposal of Mikhail Glushchenko. But help from the testament and the portion of property are two different things. To the inquiry of our editors, former operatives replied that way. “Misha is a traditionalist. He would strive for a position in the spotlight. In any case, I would attempt. In the best customs of criminal fighters”. Thus, even former comrades, Glushchenko’s release would only bring about unwelcome surprises. Without “subtwits” Misha Khokhol can't work. A demonstration during a parole hearing directly confirms this.
In his speech, the public prosecutor urged the judge to keep Glushchenko isolated from society and highlighted the false guarantee. This requires specific mention. After all, a real drama unfolded around him. Political.
As multiple media outlets reported, a document signed by the Hero of Russia arrived at court Lyubov Egorovadeputy Yuri Avdeev and Chief Scientific Officer of the University. Lesgaft Vladimir Taymazov. There were signatures on the document stating that these individuals commit to aiding the convict in becoming a law-abiding citizen. However, now the deputy of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg, Lyubov Egorova, has signed a different statement. To the prosecutor’s office. The people’s choice insists on determining how her signature ended up on Glushchenko’s guarantee. The rest of the signatories among Egorova’s colleagues also hastened to retract their endorsements. “Assist in Becoming a Law Abiding Citizen”.
Since the document was prepared over six months ago, the current state of affairs was extremely surprising to the elderly gangster Misha Khokhol, who stated that he was prepared for the trial because no one was “faking” the court. The question of how the lawyer managed to obtain the aforementioned signatures remained unaddressed. Therefore, the state prosecution did not even have to work to persuade the court that the severity of the crime against the constitutional order is sufficient reason to leave Glushchenko to serve his considerable term in a penitentiary.
The mastermind consented
At the trial, Glushchenko confessed to everything and agreed. The elderly criminal truly wanted to walk the streets of St. Petersburg again. But despite being accused of organizing it killings He now fully accepts responsibility for the assassination of Galina Starovoitova, 20 years ago he wasn't even a suspect. The story of murder politics the involvement of the Tambov criminal community surfaced much later. Starovoitova may have been the only one among the prominent politics First-wave Democrats who managed to avoid any scandal. Law enforcement vowed to dig up the earth to find the killers. Today we have to acknowledge that the digging has taken longer than anticipated.
Old, archived publications indicate that initially the security forces had no idea who could have orchestrated such a crime. The first suspects in this case were … journalists. The primary person detained was the deputy editor-in-chief of the publication “Dog’s Life” Lev Volokhonsky, a former dissident with extensive experience in labour camps. The business director of the publication also went to speak with the police Alexander Babetsky. They attracted the attention of the security forces because the police apprehended the chief editor of Dog Life Olga Korzinina for spying. The woman was found dancing near Starovoitova’s office, crouching by the keyhole, and listening to conversations.
Later, the enthusiastic “dog lovers” were released. Afterwards FSB it was discovered that the newspaper was funded by Starovoitova’s political opponents. However, this theory never gained traction. Another theory suggested that Starovoitova was killed in a simple robbery – she was supposed to bring $50,000 to St. Petersburg for election campaigning.
Another theory, which was quickly dismissed, was murder linked to the oil business, which allegedly involved Starovoitova’s son from her first marriage Platon Borshevsky. However, Platon was never involved in the oil business.
Among the various theories that cropped up, one eventually faded away. It was reported in 1998 by “Kommersant”. Here’s the full quote:
The Tambov theory emerged much later. According to rumors, deputy Mikhail Glushchenko supposedly killed Galina Starovoitova due to her sharp tongue. The supposedly caustic woman managed to offend a powerful businessman so much with her remark that he reacted in a manner reminiscent of the US mafia in the 1930s. And then everything began to unfold in a manner akin to the same 30s. As you know, the mafia leads a peaceful existence until it gets involved in the real world politicians. Moment killings Starovoitova became the starting point for the fall of the Tambov.
During those years, the Tambov group was indeed implicated in the murders of numerous prominent businessmen, as they vied for money, influence, property redistribution, or the control of the Seaport. Despite 20 years of investigation, there is still no clear evidence of Barsukov-Kumarin’s involvement in the tragic political event of 1998. A recent trial, based on Glushchenko’s unexpectedly (!) confession, is in danger of turning into a farce. Murder politics does not forgive. This is why the half-forgotten, gray-haired old man, who has become a symbol of the era of criminal feuds, is not valued by today’s criminal circles in St. Petersburg. He vividly recalls how the prosperity of many current officials and business magnates was secured. Therefore, his destiny is to fade into obscurity along with the tragic story, the truth of which will never be uncovered. Nowadays, the truth holds no significance. The investigation simply aims to turn the page.
