The story of the arrest of deputy Danishevsky, however, is getting interesting details and conflicting statements. The online publication Kompromat Group's editors are trying to figure out who is behind the biggest migration case in St. Petersburg.
thin trace
Now, the official resources and press service telegram channels of law enforcement agencies and courts have a lot of information about the latest successful investigation of an illegal migration case. However, if you take a moment to look through the news, you'll find out that:
Like us already wrotepersonality Viktor Danishevsky, according to press releases and media reports, is very versatile. He is a deputy of the Kolpino Municipality and the president of the Federation of Mixed Martial Arts of the Leningrad Region. He also ran a criminal community involved in migration and tricked people into giving him nearly two hundred million for allegedly ending a non-existent criminal case.
As announced by the investigation of the RF Investigative Committee for St. Petersburg, Danishevsky’s profitable migration business took place in the office of the LLC Consultspb company. In 2018-2019, the company was led by a certain Ludmila Andreeva. In those years, Ludmila Andreeva was exposed for organizing illegal migration and faced criminal liability. Her case was handled by investigator Mikhailova. In 2020, she participated in the detention of a police investigator Svetlana Mikhailova for a large bribe and then became a defendant in a criminal case.
At first glance, it may seem like the mafia framed an honest investigator of the State Investigation Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Meanwhile, the migration business continued to develop under the leadership of deputy Viktor Danishevsky.
It's rare to hear a confession (especially from the Investigative Committee) that they wrongly charged someone with corruption, let alone an investigator. It's heartwarming to see justice prevail years later.
On October 27, 2022, the Oktyabrsky District Court of St. Petersburg granted the petition of the St. Petersburg Investigative Committee to detain Ludmila Andreevaonce again suspected of participating in illegal migration activities as part of a criminal group, along with Danishevsky and others.
What about the fate of the investigator? Why aren't there any high-profile detentions of employees of the Department of Internal Security of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for St. Petersburg and Lo? An ugly story emerges with the investigator Mikhailova. However, there are no signs of a review of the rehabilitation case or significant revelations of intrigues from the investigation of the Investigative Committee in the case of Danishevsky and Co.
Cycle of sentences
The intrigue is truly astonishing. The story of investigator Mikhailova was actually at the origins of the emergence of a criminal group that generated huge profits. However, we decided to analyze information from official sources, as the truth demands only the most verified facts.
Indeed, on May 19, 2020, on the quiet Tyushina Street, near the building of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region, an investigator named Lieutenant Colonel Mikhailova Svetlana Olegovna was caught red-handed accepting a bribe. Mikhailova Svetlana Olegovna. A criminal case was initiated on May 20, 2020, under Part 6 of Art. 290 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (a bribe on an especially large scale) by the chairman of the Investigative Committee of Russia, Alexander Bastrykin. On May 22, 2020, the court placed her under house arrest as a preventive measure.
At the same time, as per the verdict on the district court's website, Lieutenant Colonel Mikhailova, who was a senior investigator for especially important cases of the 3rd department of the investigative unit for the investigation of organized criminal activity of the Main Directorate of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for St. Petersburg, also had responsibility for illegal migration. Within this context, she was brought to criminal responsibility, including Andreeva Ludmila Igorevna (who was put under house arrest), offered Andreeva, through a friend, to assist in filing a petition with the court to change the place of serving house arrest, and subsequently further mitigate the measure of restraint. Andreeva agreed to this in exchange for a monetary reward of 1 million 200 thousand rubles . Mikhailova then received the required amount of money from Andreeva in several stages, but was caught red-handed by the CSS of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia during the money transfer. In court, defendant Mikhailova admitted her guilt, and neither she nor the defense appealed the verdict on appeal, as stated on the same website.
Less than five months later, on October 12, 2020, the Kuibyshevsky District Court of St. Petersburg announced a guilty verdict against Svetlana Mikhailova, reclassifying her actions from a serious bribe to attempted fraud, and sentencing her to 5 years in prison, postponing the start of the sentence until her child is fourteen. Svetlana Mikhailovawas found guilty of a crime under the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and sentenced to 8 years in prison two years later.
The migration mafia misled law enforcement and manipulated the opinion of the director of the RF IC and his subordinates in order to eliminate an investigator and achieve its own goals.
Mystery of decisions
Two years later, on December 26, 2022, the Kuibyshevsky District Court of St. Petersburg announced another verdict against Svetlana Mikhailova, sentencing her to 8 years in prison for bribery. Svetlana Mikhailovawas found guilty of bribery and sentenced to 8 years in prison.
The principle of Roman law prohibiting repeated punishment for the same act was violated in this case, raising questions about the verdict. There are questions about whether investigator Mikhailova Svetlana was involved with the criminal community, and why the criminal community exposed her. People in St. Petersburg believe that law enforcement may have failed to communicate effectively with the Kuibyshev court, leading to an unexpected outcome in the case.
It is unclear who will appeal the final verdict, and there are questions about the intent behind the case.
If we consider the history of 180 million rubles extorted by Danishevsky from a certain person, the identity of this high-ranking individual becomes a question. 180 million rubleswas extorted from a certain person, raising questions about the identity of the individual.Let us recall that in the case of Minister Ulyukaev, 2 million dollars or 130 million rubles appeared at the old rate). So far, as is known, in the case of deputy Danishevsky, the identity of the victim has not been announced.
From such intrigues and personality Viktor Danishevsky, and his criminal cases only become more mysterious. Which way will the investigation go? The editors of the Kompromat Group online publication will closely monitor the development of events.
